On "Blow Blog" on nyt.com, Charles Blow argues that the reason VT went with gay marriage so easily as a legislative victory is because they are not a religious state, or as much a religious state as other states.
Hmmmm...
Consider this:
Opponents of gay marriage often base their arguments on religious texts. “Homosexuality is a sin – an abomination.” “Marriage is between men and women.” “Blah, blah, blah.” (It’s baffling how intelligent people try to derive a well-rounded set of modern mores from books written by men who didn’t even know that the world was round. But, I digress.)
So does the sense of "being religious" in a state predict how easily gay marriage is accepted as a norm?
Click here for more.
Pace! B
Police Chief Hired to Help Lead N.Y.C. Hospital Patrols Abruptly Quits
-
The assistant chief, Jamiel Altaheri, resigned almost immediately after
starting the job, after The New York Times asked about misconduct
allegations while...
2 hours ago

No comments:
Post a Comment