Saw this on andrewsullivan.com, and I think I've seen it posted on other web and blog sites. It is filmed in NY, as a constituent of Sen. Maziarz of NY Senate is asked by Ann (filmed by her wife Beth), about how is going to vote for the marriage equality bill in NY. She is eloquent, rational, logical, and as she states often, she is asking for a vote for CIVIL and not a religious marriage, as guaranteed by the law re: equality of all people under the law.
He, in return, is polite, doesn't answer her question except to say he either believes or feels that marriage is between one man and one woman.
But I don't care about what he feels or believes: I want him to do the serious work of thinking through the implications of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, etc., which guarantees us the right to marry, just like any straight person(s) can. For $40, straight people can get a marriage certificate and have all these laws that protect couples, especially in hard times. Over 1,000 laws. Meanwhile, we in our partnered state get nada; null; nothing; zero; air.
Come on, people: think this one through and let's act on it.
Hong Kong May Ban Political Party That Seeks Independence From China - The ban, which would be the first of a political party since the territory returned to Chinese control in 1997, has raised fears of eroding rights.
1 hour ago