My take on the hearing as posted on parentsociety.com
On March 26, 2013, the Supreme Court of the U.S. considered a case
regarding the constitutional legitimacy of California’s Proposition 8.
For me, along with many other lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
individuals and couples, and our straight allies, our attention was
clearly focused on what was happening in Washington, D.C.
For background, in 2008, Proposition 8 amended the state constitution
of California to stop same-sex marriages after the state Supreme Court
permitted marriage equality. The Proposition amended the state
constitution to say: “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid
or recognized in California.”
The problem was this: many same-sex couples had already been wed. It
was a right given to same-sex couples. The question became, “Can a right
that has already been granted to a group of people be taken away?”
Furthermore, the other question considered had to do with the equal
protection law of the U.S. constitution: “no state shall … deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” United States District Court Judge Vaughn Walker put a halt to Prop 8 based partially on the equal protection law.
In the hearing before the Supreme Court of the U.S., one of the
issues the court had to deal with was who was representing the
proponents of Prop 8 before the Court. The lawyers speaking in defense
of Prop 8 were not representing the state government of
California. Indeed, California’s attorney general, along with the
Governor, does not support Prop 8. But listening to the justices, we
also heard a split court.
For example, while acknowledging gay marriage is a new concept in a
tradition that stretches back thousands of years, Justice Kennedy said
there is an “immediate legal injury” to same-sex couples in California
who are raising children but unable to marry legally. He wondered how
the law could affect the roughly 40,000 children of same-sex couples.
But Justice Alito also asked: “You want us to step in and render a
decision based on an assessment of (gay marriage) which is newer than
cellphones or the internet,” he said, openly wondering whether it is too
soon to make marriage equality the law of the land.
Read more here: http://www.parentsociety.com/todays-family/same-sex-parents/why-we-should-all-care-about-prop-8/
Trump’s Tax Plan: Low Rate for Corporations, and for Companies Like His - The blueprint, expected to be announced on Wednesday, jettisons a House Republican proposal to impose a tax on imports, which would help offset the cuts.
2 hours ago